Most people who exercise regularly do some form of cardiovascular activity. They walk, run, cycle, or swim. Some have a Zone 2 routine they're proud of. What a much smaller proportion of people do with any consistency is resistance training, and the evidence suggests this is one of the most consequential gaps in population health.
Resistance training is associated with reduced all-cause mortality, lower rates of cardiovascular and cancer-related death, preserved muscle mass, stronger bones, better insulin sensitivity, and clinically meaningful improvements in depression and anxiety. These are not modest signals from small studies. They are consistent findings across large meta-analyses and prospective cohort studies, in men and women, across age groups, and at exercise volumes that most people could realistically achieve. The evidence base for resistance training is, in many respects, more robust than the evidence for almost any other single lifestyle intervention in medicine.
This article covers what resistance training is, why it matters at every stage of adult life, what the evidence actually shows, and how to start without a gym membership, a personal trainer, or any prior experience.
What resistance training actually is, and what it is not
Resistance training is any form of exercise that causes muscles to work against an external force or load. The word "resistance" refers to anything that your muscles have to push, pull, lift, or stabilize against. This can be gravity acting on your own body weight, a set of dumbbells, resistance bands, weight machines at a gym, or even household objects. The common thread is that muscles are asked to generate force against a load, and over time, that load is progressively increased.
Resistance training is not just for people who want to look muscular, it is not inherently dangerous for older adults or people with health conditions, and it does not require a gym. Some of the most well-studied resistance training protocols for bone density, fall prevention, and longevity are designed for older adults and can be performed entirely at home. The persistent idea that resistance training is only for young people or gym-goers is one of the most expensive misconceptions in health, it keeps the people who need it most from doing it.
Muscle loss starts earlier than most people realize
Adults begin losing muscle mass somewhere in their 30s, and that rate accelerates meaningfully with each subsequent decade. This process, called sarcopenia when it reaches a level that affects daily function, is not simply about how you look. Muscle is living tissue that does far more than move your body. It is the primary place where your body burns glucose for energy, it protects your joints, and it keeps you upright and stable. It generates the strength needed for independent function: carrying groceries, climbing stairs, getting up from the floor, catching yourself when you stumble.
The rate above represents typical sedentary aging trajectories. Resistance training does not halt this process entirely, but consistently attenuates it, preserving muscle mass and strength at every age. Studies in adults over 70 who had never trained show meaningful improvements in muscle strength and function within 8 to 12 weeks of starting a resistance program.
The mortality evidence: what large studies actually show
The association between resistance training and reduced mortality has been studied in prospective cohort studies involving hundreds of thousands of adults. A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine (Shailendra et al.) analyzed 10 studies and found that any amount of resistance training, compared to none, was associated with a 15% reduction in all-cause mortality risk and a 14% reduction in cancer-specific mortality. These reductions held after adjustment for aerobic physical activity, meaning resistance training's benefits were independent of whether participants also did cardio. A separate systematic review by Saeidifard et al. in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology found a 21% reduction in all-cause mortality and a borderline, non-statistically-significant trend toward reduced cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.03), underscoring that cardiovascular and all-cause mortality findings are not identical.
Importantly, the dose-response relationship for mortality appears to plateau at relatively modest volumes. The mortality benefit was observed at just one to two sessions per week in several analyses, well below the level that most people assume is required. Multiple meta-analyses, including Momma et al. (BJSM, 2022), the most comprehensive to date, covering 16 studies, suggest a J-shaped dose-response curve, with risk reduction peaking at approximately 30 to 60 minutes of resistance training per week, with possible attenuation of benefits at very high volumes above 2.5 hours per week. This means more is not always better from a mortality standpoint, though higher volumes confer greater functional and metabolic benefit at moderate levels.
The mortality benefit of resistance training is observed at one to two sessions per week. The barrier to meaningful health benefit is lower than almost anyone assumes.
per week
~30–60 min/week
~60–120 min/week
>2.5 hrs/week
The full range of evidence-backed benefits
| Benefit | Evidence quality | What the research shows |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause mortality reduction | Strong | 15% reduction in all-cause mortality risk vs. no resistance training, with a borderline non-significant signal for cardiovascular mortality reduction (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66–1.00) (Shailendra et al., AJPM 2022). A separate meta-analysis by Saeidifard et al. confirmed the all-cause mortality finding and similarly found a non-significant cardiovascular mortality trend (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67–1.03). Both studies show consistent directionality; neither cardiovascular finding reached statistical significance. |
| Cardiovascular mortality reduction | Strong | Additive benefit when resistance and aerobic training are combined. The 2025 umbrella review by Rahmati et al. found combined training associated with a 40% mortality reduction (eHR 0.60) vs. 18% for resistance training alone, representing the strongest current synthesis. Note: cardiovascular mortality reduction specifically was borderline non-significant in the Saeidifard meta-analysis. |
| Muscle mass preservation | Strong | Consistently attenuates sarcopenia across all age groups. Progressive resistance training is first-line treatment for established sarcopenia (Delaire et al., J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle, 2025). |
| Bone mineral density | Strong | Significant improvements at lumbar spine (SMD 0.88) and femoral neck (SMD 0.89) in postmenopausal women in a 2025 meta-analysis of 17 RCTs. Progressive high-intensity resistance training is now considered the optimal exercise prescription for bone density (Springer Nature meta-analysis, 2025). |
| Insulin sensitivity and metabolic health | Strong | Skeletal muscle is the primary site of insulin-mediated glucose disposal. Consistent resistance training improves insulin sensitivity for 24–48 hours post-session and produces lasting GLUT4 upregulation with chronic training. ADA and ACSM both recommend resistance training for type 2 diabetes prevention and management. |
| Depression and anxiety reduction | Strong | A 2025 meta-analysis in Frontiers in Psychology (Chang et al.) across more than 20 RCTs found significant reductions in depressive symptoms with resistance training. Gordon et al. (JAMA Psychiatry, 2018) found a significant antidepressant effect of resistance training regardless of dose, volume of training was not a significant moderator, meaning the benefit was observed across a range of session frequencies and durations. A 2025 IJMHN meta-analysis found resistance training comparable to aerobic exercise for both depression and anxiety outcomes. |
| Blood pressure reduction | Good | Consistent reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure across multiple meta-analyses. Effect is complementary to aerobic exercise. |
| Functional independence and fall prevention | Strong | Improves grip strength, gait speed, balance, and performance on functional tests (Timed Up and Go, Chair Stand). These outcomes directly predict fall risk and independent living capacity in older adults (Zhou et al., Front Public Health, 2026). |
| Resting metabolic rate | Good | Each pound (450 g) of muscle tissue burns approximately 6 kcal/day at rest. Adding lean mass through resistance training increases resting metabolic rate and partially counteracts the adaptive thermogenesis associated with weight loss. |
| Cognitive function | Emerging | Growing evidence for improvements in executive function and memory with resistance training. Proposed mechanisms include BDNF upregulation, improved cerebrovascular function, and reduced systemic inflammation. Data is consistent but trial quality varies. |
Bone health: the case that is often missed
Bone responds to mechanical loading, specifically, the stress that muscles pulling against the skeleton generate during resistance exercise. This stress signals the body to build new bone tissue. Without it, bone breaks down faster than it is rebuilt, and density gradually falls. Aerobic exercise provides some benefit, particularly weight-bearing activities like walking, but does not create the same bone-building signal that resistance training does when performed at adequate intensity.
A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (covering 17 RCTs involving 690 postmenopausal women) found significant improvements in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip with resistance training. High-intensity protocols, specifically progressive resistance at 65 to 80% of maximum effort, produced the most consistent results. The LIFTMOR trial, which used a supervised high-intensity resistance and impact training program twice weekly, showed significant BMD increases at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis, with no fractures or serious adverse events.
Mental health: stronger evidence than most people expect
The mental health benefits of aerobic exercise are widely discussed. The evidence for resistance training and mental health is comparably robust but far less widely communicated, a pattern that may partly explain why resistance training is underutilized as part of mental health management.
A 2018 meta-analysis in JAMA Psychiatry (Gordon et al.) covering 33 randomized controlled trials found that resistance exercise training significantly reduced depressive symptoms with a moderate effect size (Δ = 0.66), independent of health status. Importantly, the total volume of training was not a significant moderator; the antidepressant effect was observed regardless of how many sessions per week participants completed. The effect was observed with as little as two sessions per week. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis in the International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (Banyard et al.) confirmed that both aerobic and resistance exercise reduced depression and anxiety symptoms in clinically diagnosed patients, with comparable effect sizes between modalities. A 2024 meta-analysis specifically in older adults (Cunha et al., Psychiatry Research) found resistance training reduced both depressive symptoms (mean effect size 0.94) and anxiety symptoms (mean effect size 1.33).
The exact mechanisms are still being studied, but resistance training appears to reduce stress hormones, increase brain-protective proteins, lower inflammation, improve sleep quality, and build a genuine sense of physical confidence, all of which contribute to better mental health.
Metabolic health and insulin resistance
Skeletal muscle is the single largest site of insulin-mediated glucose disposal in the human body. When you contract a muscle, it takes up glucose (blood sugar) both with and without insulin's help. A single resistance training session can improve how well your body manages blood sugar for the next 24 to 48 hours, a mechanism that is distinct from how GLP-1 receptor agonists work. GLP-1 medications primarily act through incretin-mediated insulin secretion, appetite suppression, and delayed gastric emptying rather than direct GLUT4-mediated glucose uptake. The two approaches improve glucose disposal through complementary but separate pathways, making them an effective combination.
With consistent training over time, this improvement becomes lasting, your body simply gets better at managing blood sugar, independent of medication. People with insulin resistance, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes who engage in consistent resistance training show meaningful reductions in fasting glucose, HbA1c, and HOMA-IR. The American Diabetes Association and the American College of Sports Medicine both recommend resistance training as a core component of diabetes management and prevention, alongside aerobic exercise.
Resistance training and perimenopausal symptoms
Perimenopause brings a constellation of symptoms, hot flashes, sleep disruption, mood changes, joint pain, and accelerating body composition shifts, that coincide precisely with the period when muscle and bone loss begin to accelerate. Resistance training addresses several of these simultaneously, making it one of the most efficient investments a woman in her 40s or early 50s can make in her long-term health.
Hot flashes and vasomotor symptoms
The strongest single trial on resistance training and hot flashes is Berin et al. (Maturitas, 2019), a randomized controlled trial in which 15 weeks of resistance training three times per week produced a 43.6% reduction in moderate-to-severe hot flushes compared to controls. This study is notable for its magnitude of effect and for using objective measures of hot flash frequency rather than self-report alone. A 2024 meta-analysis published in the Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies (covering five studies) found that resistance training significantly reduced vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women compared to controls, with a large effect size (SMD −1.31, 95% CI −1.85 to −0.77). Research from Linköping University (Nilsson et al., 2022) found that resistance training reduced LH (luteinizing hormone) in postmenopausal women, and since elevated LH is thought to contribute to hot flashes, this was proposed as a possible mechanism. It is worth noting, however, that in the same study, the reduction in LH did not directly correlate with the reduction in hot flash frequency within individual participants, meaning the link between these two findings remains speculative. The underlying mechanism is still being studied. Results across the broader exercise-and-menopause literature are heterogeneous. A 2022 systematic review by Liu et al. (Climacteric) found only a small effect on VMS severity that became non-significant after excluding higher-risk-of-bias studies, and the Sá et al. 2023 meta-analysis graded the overall evidence for resistance training and menopausal symptoms as very low to low certainty. This means the direction of the evidence is encouraging and consistent, but readers should understand the findings are not definitive. Among the exercise modalities studied, resistance training has the most consistent signal for vasomotor symptom reduction.
Mood, anxiety, and cognitive changes
The mental health benefits of resistance training described earlier in this article are particularly relevant in perimenopause, when falling estrogen disrupts the brain's mood-regulating chemistry and stress responses become more reactive. A 2023 systematic review of 12 RCTs involving more than 800 women (Capel-Alcaraz et al., Journal of Clinical Medicine) found that strength training improved musculoskeletal health and was associated with positive effects on hormonal and metabolic markers in menopausal women, including stabilized blood pressure and improvements in body composition. The broader mental health benefits of resistance training in this age group are supported by the depression and anxiety meta-analyses described earlier in this article. A 2025 BMC Women's Health RCT found that combined resistance and aerobic training significantly improved mood and psychological symptoms in postmenopausal women (p < 0.01).
Sleep quality
Sleep disruption is among the most common and distressing perimenopausal symptoms, driven by night sweats, altered sleep architecture, and mood dysregulation. Resistance training improves sleep quality through multiple pathways: reduction of vasomotor symptoms that cause night waking, HPA axis normalization that reduces nocturnal cortisol, and direct effects on sleep architecture. The 2025 BMC Women's Health RCT documented significant improvements in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores with combined resistance and aerobic training compared to controls (p < 0.01).
Body composition and metabolic shifts
The perimenopause-associated shift toward central adiposity and visceral fat accumulation is driven partly by declining estrogen and partly by the muscle loss that begins accelerating in this decade. Resistance training counteracts both drivers simultaneously: it preserves and rebuilds lean mass, which supports resting metabolic rate, and reduces visceral adiposity independently of aerobic exercise. The 2023 Menopause systematic review and meta-analysis (Sá et al.) confirmed significant benefits of resistance training on body composition, cardiovascular risk markers, and functional outcomes specifically in postmenopausal women.
How much do you actually need?
Current guidelines from the American College of Sports Medicine, the American Heart Association, and the World Health Organization recommend resistance training for all major muscle groups at least two days per week. As the dose-response chart above shows, this threshold is where the bulk of the mortality benefit lives, you do not need to train five days a week to get most of what resistance training offers for long-term health.
For most beginners, two to three sessions per week of 20 to 45 minutes, covering the major muscle groups (legs, back, chest, shoulders, and core), is a practical and effective starting point. Full-body sessions work better for beginners than splitting muscle groups across separate days, since they keep each muscle getting trained more frequently while still allowing recovery.
Progressive overload: the one principle you actually need to understand
Resistance training produces its benefits because muscles adapt to the demands placed on them. When a muscle is asked to do something a little harder than it is used to, it adapts and becomes slightly stronger. The next time you train at the same level, it feels easier, which means it is time to increase the challenge slightly. Progressive overload is the practice of systematically increasing the challenge over time to keep driving adaptation.
This does not require calculating percentages of maximum lifts or following complex periodization schemes. For beginners and most general health purposes, it can be approached simply:
How to get started: a practical framework for beginners
The most common reason people do not start resistance training is that they do not know where to begin. The second most common reason is that they believe they need a gym. Neither is an obstacle once you understand that almost all of the health benefits documented in the research are achievable with bodyweight exercises and minimal equipment at home.
The goal is eventually two sessions per week, but the hardest part is simply starting. If all you can manage right now is 2 to 5 minutes of squats at the end of your daily walk, or one 15-minute session per week, that counts. That is resistance training. That is adaptation beginning. Whatever you can do consistently, even briefly, is far more valuable than a perfect program you never start. Start small, start imperfect, and build from there.
- 2 sessions per week, 20 to 25 minutes each
- Bodyweight only, no equipment needed
- Squats (or sit-to-stand from a chair), push-ups (on knees if needed), glute bridges, bird-dog, wall push
- 2 sets of 8 to 10 repetitions per exercise
- Rest 60 to 90 seconds between sets
- Focus on controlled movement, not speed
- 2 to 3 sessions per week, 30 to 40 minutes
- Progress to resistance bands or light dumbbells if accessible
- Add: Romanian deadlift, row (band or dumbbell), overhead press, reverse lunge
- 3 sets of 10 to 12 repetitions
- Apply progressive overload: when all sets feel manageable, add resistance or progress the movement variation
- Track sessions in a notebook or app, seeing progress matters for adherence
A pair of adjustable dumbbells (5 to 30 lb / 2 to 14 kg) and a resistance band set covers the vast majority of evidence-based resistance training exercises for general health. Total cost is typically $50 to $150 and eliminates the gym access barrier entirely. If even this is a barrier, bodyweight alone is sufficient for meaningful benefit at beginner and intermediate levels.
The five fundamental movements are squat, hinge (like a deadlift), push, pull, and carry. Every effective resistance training program is built from some combination of these, whether you are using a barbell, a dumbbell, a resistance band, or your own bodyweight. Most can be learned from free videos online, and none requires a gym.
Special considerations
Resistance training as a clinical prescription
Resistance training is underutilized in clinical practice relative to its evidence base. The 2022 AJPM meta-analysis (Shailendra et al.) provides the strongest mortality evidence to date, 15% all-cause mortality reduction with any resistance training versus none, and this benefit was observed independent of aerobic activity. Combined resistance and aerobic training produces additive benefits beyond either alone.
The dose required for mortality benefit is clinically achievable: even one to two sessions per week at modest intensity is associated with the documented reductions. For sedentary patients, this is an accessible initial prescription. Framing it as two 25-minute sessions per week lowers the perceived barrier significantly.
Key clinical applications:
- GLP-1 therapy: Patients on semaglutide or tirzepatide losing weight rapidly should be explicitly counseled on resistance training as the primary lean mass preservation strategy. The evidence supports combined resistance training and adequate protein intake (see protein calculator link below) as the standard of care during GLP-1-driven weight loss.
- Osteopenia and osteoporosis: Progressive high-intensity resistance training is now supported by 2025 meta-analysis data (Springer Nature, JOSR) as the optimal exercise prescription for BMD improvement, superior to moderate-intensity protocols. Clinical supervision reduces risk appropriately.
- Type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance: ADA and ACSM 2022 consensus both recommend resistance training as a core component alongside aerobic exercise. Resistance training's GLUT4-mediated improvements are mechanistically complementary to GLP-1 medications.
- Mental health comorbidity: The JAMA Psychiatry 2018 meta-analysis (Gordon et al.) established resistance training's antidepressant effect at a level comparable to aerobic exercise. For patients with depression or anxiety who are already receiving pharmacological or psychological treatment, exercise prescription, specifically including resistance training, is a legitimate adjunctive recommendation.
- Sarcopenia screening: Grip strength is emerging as a clinical vital sign. Low grip strength is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and functional decline. Routine grip strength measurement is low-cost and provides actionable prognostic information.
A useful framing for patient conversations: resistance training is not optional at any age, but its importance increases with each decade. For patients who respond to concrete goals, two sessions per week for eight weeks with a structured beginner program is a specific, achievable, and evidence-based prescription with documented health outcomes.
References and sources
- Shailendra P, Baldock KL, Li LSK, Bennie JA, Boyle T. Resistance training and mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2022;63(2):277–285. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.020
- Saeidifard F, Medina-Inojosa JR, West CP, et al. The association of resistance training with mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(15):1647–1665. doi:10.1177/2047487319850718
- Gordon BR, McDowell CP, Hallgren M, Meyer JD, Lyons M, Herring MP. Association of efficacy of resistance exercise training with depressive symptoms: meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(6):566–576. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0572
- Banyard H, Edward K-L, Garvey L, Stephenson J, Azevedo L, Benson AC. The effects of aerobic and resistance exercise on depression and anxiety: systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Mental Health Nurs. 2025;34:e70054. doi:10.1111/inm.70054
- Chang Y, Wang H, Zhang X, Shan S, Liu H. Resistance training for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1655855. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1655855
- Li M, Liu Y, Wang X, et al. Optimal resistance training parameters for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20:528. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-05890-1
- Watson SL, Weeks BK, Weis LJ, Harding AT, Horan SA, Beck BR. High-intensity resistance and impact training improves bone mineral density and physical function in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis: the LIFTMOR randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(2):211–220. doi:10.1002/jbmr.3284
- Cunha PM, Nunes JP, Tomeleri CM, et al. Can resistance training improve mental health outcomes in older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychiatry Res. 2024;333:115746. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115746
- Delaire L, Courtay-Breuil A, Humblot J, et al. Influence of resistance training variables to improve muscle mass outcomes in sarcopenia: a systematic review with meta-regressions. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025;16:e70162. doi:10.1002/jcsm.70162
- Zhou Y, Wen K, Zhang X, Sun Y. Effects of resistance training on muscle mass, strength, and physical function in older women with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2026;13:1735899. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1735899
- Kanaley JA, Colberg SR, Corcoran MH, et al. Exercise/physical activity in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a consensus statement from the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54(2):353–368. PMC8802999
- Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31. doi:10.1093/ageing/afy169
- Svensen E, Clifford T, Weldon SM, et al. A novel low-impact resistance exercise program increases strength and balance in females irrespective of menopause status. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003586
- Momma H, Kawakami R, Honda T, Sawada SS. Muscle-strengthening activities are associated with lower risk and mortality in major non-communicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(13):755–763. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-105061
- Paluch AE, Boyer WR, Franklin BA, et al. Resistance exercise training in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2023 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024;149(3):e217–e231. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001189
- Rahmati M, Lee H, Lee H, et al. Associations between exercise training, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and mortality: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025;16:e13775. doi:10.1002/jcsm.13772
- Kistler-Fischbacher M, Weeks BK, Beck BR. The effect of exercise intensity on bone in postmenopausal women (Part 2): a meta-analysis. Bone. 2021;143:115697. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2020.115697
- Capel-Alcaraz AM, García-López H, Castro-Sánchez AM, Fernández-Sánchez M, Lara-Palomo IC. The efficacy of strength exercises for reducing the symptoms of menopause: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(2):548. doi:10.3390/jcm12020548
- Sá KMM, da Silva GR, Martins UK, et al. Resistance training for postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis. Menopause. 2023;30(1):108–116. doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000002079
- Fan W, Luo W, Huang Q, et al. The effect of resistance training in reducing hot flushes in post-menopausal women: a meta-analysis. J Bodywork Mov Ther. 2024;39:293–298. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.019
- BMC Women's Health RCT. Effects of exercise training on vasomotor symptoms and quality of life in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2025;25:618. doi:10.1186/s12905-025-04231-y
- Mozaffarian D, Agarwal M, Aggarwal M, et al. Nutritional priorities to support GLP-1 therapy for obesity: a joint advisory from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, the American Society for Nutrition, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the Obesity Society. Am J Clin Nutr. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.029
- Berin E, Hammar M, Lindblom H, Lindh-Åstrand L, Spetz Holm AC. Resistance training for hot flushes in postmenopausal women: a randomised controlled trial. Maturitas. 2019;126:55–60. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.05.005
- Nilsson S, Henriksson M, Berin E, Engblom D, Holm ACS, Hammar M. Resistance training reduced luteinising hormone levels in postmenopausal women in a sub-study of a randomised controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0268935. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268935
- Liu T, Chen S, Mielke GI, McCarthy AL, Bailey TG. Effects of exercise on vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Climacteric. 2022;25(6):552–561. doi:10.1080/13697137.2022.2097865
- Wilkinson DJ, Piasecki M, Atherton PJ. The age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function: measurement and physiology of muscle fibre atrophy and muscle fibre loss in humans. Ageing Res Rev. 2018;47:123–132. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2018.07.005
